|
Post by newboy on Jul 5, 2009 19:39:02 GMT 1
Well today Federer won Wimbledon and now has 15 grand slams, and many are calling him the best now. What do you guys think, is he really the best?
I personally believe that Rod Laver is the greatest as he went through 5 years when he didnt compete in grand slams, and this was during his peak. Another reason i believe he cannot be the greatest is that Nadal has thumped him recently (Roland Garros 08, Wimbledon 08 and Australian open 09) federer was in tears, and you can tell that Federer is shaken by Nadal. I think Fededrer has got off lightly because Nadal suffers from Tendinitis and that has probably cost him 2 grand slams.
|
|
|
Post by Rogue on Jul 6, 2009 8:22:31 GMT 1
Yeah, I totally agree with you. I don't like Federer... I mean, for being the greatest of all time you need more than just a great, amazing play...
|
|
|
Post by newboy on Jul 6, 2009 10:20:00 GMT 1
Its annoying thought, everyone says that Federer is the best now just because he has the most titles, no one thinks about how Nadal has wiped the floor with him for the last year and a half.
|
|
s h a d o w.
Junior Member
Befriend the shadows like I have!
Posts: 93
|
Post by s h a d o w. on Jul 8, 2009 3:12:29 GMT 1
He seems interesting but I would have to watch him play to say anything more about him
|
|